Large Language Models (LLMs) are advancing rapidly, but they still suffer from hallucinations and overconfidence, making them unreliable for high-stakes tasks. ConfidenceBench is a novel benchmark that evaluates an LLM's ability to recognise its own uncertainty. Unlike traditional benchmarks that focus only on accuracy, ConfidenceBench penalises models for being overconfident when wrong, highlighting a critical weakness in current AI systems.
Our dataset consists of 200 challenging multiple-choice questions across four categories: Spatial Reasoning, which tests whether LLMs can visualise real-world physics; High-Precision Math, which tests whether they can compute with extreme precision; Word Lookup from Texts, which tests whether they can retrieve exact information; and Offline Knowledge, which tests whether they can recognise what they don't know.
Models are scored using the Brier score, a standard metric for calibration. Lower is better. A score of 0.000 means every question was answered correctly with full confidence; 1.000 means every question was answered incorrectly with full confidence.